WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST REPORTING SPAM AND LINKS Why was the Leo Frank case controversial?
He killed one of his young workers but “got away with the crime” by claiming the janitor in his factory was the murderer.

He argued that Georgia’s segregation laws were unjust and paid all of his workers the same wages.

He became a scapegoat for the murder of Mary Phagan because he was a Northerner and Jewish.

He hired unskilled, young girls to work in his factory rather than adults who needed jobs.

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?