CAN YOU PLEASE TYPE OUT A PARAGRAPH (doesn't have to be long, but at least a lil long ig) answer each one in the paragraph! i'll mark brainliest to whoever answers first! Argue for or against the death penalty. Do you think the threat of the death
penalty is successful or unsuccessful in discouraging people from committing murder? Why or why not? Do you think the death penalty is an acceptable punishment or that it is unconstitutional?
(don't answer like an essay, just answer each question then go to the next. 20 POINTS PLEASE HELP :,)

Well I do think its a valid punishment to like a huge crime. It does discourage people from commiting these types of stuff becuase everyone values their lives (arguably) and by putting someone to death for huge crime like going on a huge murder spree, that person should be put to death and it discourages others to do what that person did. The main reason is to prevent more loss of life then that was already lost. If there was no death penalty, people wouldn’t see life in prison that bad so they would commit who knows what things to people or major establishments. More and more people are gonna do it since they won’t die and the loss of neutral and innocent lives isn’t worth a nice stable shelter at a prison. If you put someone to death, others will be afraid to commit the same crime.

answer; the automatic system because it is a "gut reactor"