2) Jamie runs into a crowded theater and yells "Fire!" People in the theater begin to panic, and some are injured as
they try to escape. In the aftermath, firefighters determine that there was no fire, and Jamie is arrested. Jamie's
lawyer argues that Jamie was only exercising the right to free speech and should not be punished.
Which BEST explains why a judge would consider this argument invalid?
A)
Jamie's actions would be considered slander.
B)
Jamie's actions were subject to due process.
C)
Jamie's actions threatened national security.
D)
Jamie's actions infringed upon others' rights.

To confirm when to exclude children from school it’s recommend that you refer to guidelines from which of the following organizations

Read the quote by jane addams. "the settlement then, is an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems in a great city." which of the following best describes what addams meant by the settlement"? chicago immigration hull house the social gospel

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.