Based on your reading of Shenk's article, "Lincoln's Great Depression", please identify two of Lincoln's most successful adaptation strategies (skills, habits, or ways of thinking) that helped him use his struggle with depression to accomplish worthy goals. Provide textual evidence (e. g. quotations) to support your answer.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you forgot to include the text/article, we can comment based on our knowledge about the topic.

In the article "Lincoln's Great Depression", the author refers to the idea that Abraham Lincoln suffered from severe depression. However, this condition always served Linco,n to make great efforts to overcome it.

To Shank, Abraham Lincoln passed three stages during his depression. A stage of fear, a stage of engagement, and a stage of transcendence. Melancholy characterized Lincoln's behavior during those stages.

The author says that Lincoln's depression was severe

So one of the strategies that helped him use his struggle with depression to accomplish worthy goals was his decision to take medical consultations in 1841. Lincoln spent many hours a day with a doctor named Anson Henry. Abraham Lincoln thought those sessions were necessary to properly behave himself and make good decisions

Another strategy was to have a clear mind and a sense of purpose for what they wanted to accomplish in life. That was one of the most important factors he used to overcome melancholy throughout his life.

He dedicated his life to improving his condition, he had self-discipline, accepted his situation, and from that point, he committed the things he needs to do to be a great politician. He focused on the practice of law as a way to escape his depression.

Joshua Wolf Shank wrote the article "Lincoln's Great Depression" for the "Atlantic," in October 2005.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

it is a better alternative