Social Studies, 05.04.2021 02:40 gogo16732

Gerald is a fussy baby. His mom says that he is a very picky eater and doesn't keep a regular feeding schedule. Gerald also does not deal well with changes in routine and often becomes fussy and hard to soothe. With regard to temperament, Gerald would most likely be classified as a child.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Blbyrd1287

Difficult

Explanation:

There are three types of temperament when it comes to babies and these are: easy, difficult and slow to warm up temperament.

Difficult temperament in babies shows itself when they have irregular bodily functions like how Gerald does not keep a regular feeding schedule. Such babies also tend to withdraw or react negatively to new situations or changes to their routine like Gerald does.

Answer from: Quest

john locke and voltaire are the two european thinkers that influenced the fathers of the united states. voltaire influenced in terms of freedom of religion, speech and press, while john locke influenced in terms of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:20, lilisncz

This excerpt supports the idea that the sky chief valued

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00, barattah

Why is it economically necessary for the east germans to build berlin wall

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:00, carnations

Which scenario validates bandura's bobo doll experiment? a. a child learning math from a teacher b. a child playing with blocks c. a child getting on a school bus d. a child smiling at others because his parents smile at others

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Gerald is a fussy baby. His mom says that he is a very picky eater and doesn't keep a regular feedin...