subject
Social Studies, 25.03.2021 14:20 arigar

Am I right or wrong? I need help..


Am I right or wrong? I need help..

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:30, lildommy420
When analyzing the election of 1876, what conclusion can be drawn? a. a majority of northerners wanted to enforce reconstruction policies more stringently. b.if tilden had won the electoral votes from louisiana, florida, or south carolina, he would have been elected president. c.the republican party had increased its support in the south. d.rutherford hayes did poorly in the western states. e.the republican party did a good job protecting the voting rights of african-americans in mississippi.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30, darkdragon67
Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: breach of confidentiality, loss of autonomy, and study proceduresstudy procedures, breach of confidentiality, and loss of employmentinvasion of privacy, adverse reaction to study drug, and discriminationinvasion of privacy, breach of confidentiality, and study procedures
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30, lunarwoo
Whose political philosophy is mostly clearly reflected in the declaration of independence
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Am I right or wrong? I need help..
...

Questions in other subjects: