Should the government be able to block chy
sort of speech? Why or why not?

I don't know what you meant by "chy" but in my opinion, absolutely not.

Explanation:

The government exists purely to serve the people and restricting our naturally born freedoms is a sign the government doesn't serve the people. once the government takes away those freedoms, it is the duty of the people to reform or revolutionize and secure those freedoms for future generations.  

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it's natural manure."-Thomas Jefferson

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.

answer; i believe its jutland peninsula and scandinavian peninsula;