comparing and contrasting any two of the ethical theories presented in Chapters 1 and 2 of your textbook (ethical relativism, divine command theory, egoism, utilitarianism, Kant's ethics; Ross's theory). Give examples to show how these theories might be used to determine what one ought to do in some particular case. Given this comparison and contrast, which of the two theories do you find most plausible and why

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

What role did radio free europe play in western countries' cold warstrategy?

What is a common factor all nonprofit businesses share? they pay no income tax. they have no capital. they are national in scope. they perform charitable acts.