Please M Does the information in the article ""Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier"" support or contradict the argument found in the interview ""Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest""? Cite Text Evidence

The information provided in the article 'Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier,' supports the argument found in the interview 'Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest.'

Explanation:

"Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier" is an article published in The Seattle Times on June 21, 2012. The article provides information about Nick Hall, a climbing ranger, who lost his life while rescuing a climber on Mount Rainier. The article informs about the life-risking jobs of the climbing ranger.

In the interview, "Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest," Nick Heil talks about the risk involved in rescuing. Nick Heil shares one incident in which the helicopter crashed while rescuing one climber.

Therefore, both the text talks about the risk involved in the rescue operation to such high altitudes.

Textual evidence:

"“We sincerely hope the loss of our son will draw appropriate  attention to the hazards and safety requirements and  commitment to be involved in the profession and sport he so  loved,..." (from "Ranger killed during rescue of climbers on Mount Rainier")

"The accident that I  describe in the beginning of the story, is on a peak called Ama  Dablam. And the helicopter flies up to about 19,000 feet and,  you know, the air at this altitude is very thin. So it requires a  helicopter to utilize more power to stay aloft up there. So, you  know, you can imagine, if you add weight, it’s going to lose lift.  So in this case, they could only bring one climber at a time.  And they got one climber off, and they crashed attempting to  rescue the second man." (from "Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest"

add the answer choices and i'll give you the answer

was the answer correct?