WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION A line graph titled Daily Market for Perfect Pepperoni Pizza shows quantity on the x-axis from 0 to 30 and price in dollars on the y-axis from 0 to 20. A line labeled S starts at (0,3.5) and increases to points (5,5), (10,7.5), (15,10), (20,12.5), (25,15). A line labeled D starts at (0,16.5) and decreases to points (5,15), (10,12.5), (15,10), (20,7.5), (25,5). Both lines intersect at point E at 15,10. A vertical dashed line labeled Q extends from point E to bottom of graph and a horizontal dashed line labeled P extends from point E to left edge of graph.

In the example above, what is the equilibrium price for Perfect Pepperoni Pizza?
A.
$5.00
B.
$10.00
C.
$15.00
D.
$17.50

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D

Why is the netherlands vulnerable to changes in climate? a. the netherlands is against nuclear power. b. forests in the netherlands have been destroyed by acid rain. c. the netherlands wrote the kyoto protocols. d. the netherlands is low-lying country, and rising sea levels may cause flooding.

What is the difference between the kurds and the shia muslims? a the kurds are a religious group while the shia muslims are an ethnic group. b the kurds and the shia muslims are religious groups. c the kurds are an ethnic group and the shia muslims are a religious group. d the kurds and the shia muslims are ethnic groups.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.