Why was bahadur sah known as good son of a good father
​

Bahadur Shah Zafar was not a capable son of a capable father.

Explanation:

Although Bahadur Shah Zafar was a better and more courageous ruler than many of his predesessors he was not an administrator per se. He was more of a poet and an artist at heart than he ever was a  king and it showed in his administration.

His father was a weaker ruler who would not think of revolting against the British, which is something that he did and had to suffer for it.

Zafar was instead an idealist king who found himself in too weak a position to ever hold power well enough.

He remained in self-exile after his father's death in Bettiah, British India, until called upon by the

Explanation:

He accompanied his father King Prithvi Narayan Shah on battlefields and in negotiations. Unlike his brother Pratap Singh Shah (1775-1777) who was a luxury loving and indulgent king more interested in tantrtism; Bahadur remained a disciplined and farsighted statesman

the answer is either c or d i think its d

well since twins have about the same dna they dont have one think in common which is the figer print. nobodys fingerprint is the same. if your using twin you would most likely get around the same results for both of them because of the genetics.. i hope this