Which statement best explains what happens when two versions of a bill are approved by the Louisiana house and senate? The bill is sent to the governor to select the best version. The bill is returned to the house that proposed it for revision. The bill is subject to a vote by both houses to choose a version. The bill is sent to a conference committee to reach a compromise.

As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.