subject
Social Studies, 02.03.2021 03:40 anessia83

5. (Sourcing) Newspapers frequently ran articles about anarchists and the threats posed by "radicals" in 1919 and 1920. Why might newspapers be interested in

running these kinds of stories? How might this have influenced the Palmer

Raids?

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:20, eweqwoewoji
The president vetoes a bill proposed to become law by congress. in this situation, what happens to the bill?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, llnapier8924
What was jimmy carter's political experience prior to becoming the president? he was both a lieutenant governor and secretary of state. city commissioner and director of the cia. he was a state senator and governor. secretary of the navy and state senator. next question @ ask for
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, nickname9154
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
5. (Sourcing) Newspapers frequently ran articles about anarchists and the threats posed by "radica...

Questions in other subjects: