10. How did the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore (2000) differ from its decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954)?
A. The Brown decision was unanimous, while the Justices divided along
suspected party lines in Bush v. Gore.
B. Bush v. Gore affected the entire nation, while Brown only had an impact
on a handful of people.
C. Brown was decided at a time of economic prosperity, while Bush v. Gore
was decided during an economic depression.
D. Bush v. Gore prohibited racial segregation in schools, while Brown
affected state voting procedures

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Why do drivers have difficulty seeing side traffic at t-intersections in rural areas?

Which of the following do scientists believe about homo sapiens?