5. A soldier is traveling home to Fort Detrick having just left Iraq. His flight is delayed overnight in Washington DC and he doesn’t feel like spending the money on a hotel or a car to get home. He walks to the closest neighborhood and knocks on Ashley’s door. He explains the situation to Ashley and says he’s soldier and expects a nice free bed to sleep in and a home cooked meal. Ashley refuses but the soldier continues to argue and says, “I’m a soldier in the United States Army and it’s the law that I’m given a place to sleep for free!” The soldier then pushes his way through the Ashley’s door.

Which of these was not a key difference between northern and southern states at the constitutional convention? wanting to protect states’ interests vs. a government with strict rules having more, larger cities vs. having fewer, smaller cities wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries having many enslaved people vs. using less enslaved labor

Rank the following from most to least devasting: ordovician, permaian, cretaceous, pleistocene

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?