Garp signed a contract with Tech Corp that had a binding arbitration clause. A dispute arose between Garp and Tech Corp and the matter was heard by an arbitrator. The arbitrator awarded Tech Corp $50,000. Under which of the following circumstances may a court judge set aside the award of the arbitrator in the hearing? A. The arbitrator was biased against Garp because he is a man.
B. Both an arbitrator's refusal to hear relevant evidence that prejudices a party's rights and bias against one's gender are grounds for setting aside an arbitrator's award.
C. Under no circumstances, because Garp entered into the contract voluntarily and Congress has ruled that arbitration is preferred over litigation as a method of dispute resolution, and awards are not set aside by courts.
D. The arbitrator refused to hear relevant evidence that prejudiced Garp's rights.