subject
Social Studies, 11.02.2021 20:40 adamsc819

A state legislature enacted a statute that required any motorcycle operator or passenger on the state’s highways to wear a protective helmet. Jim Alderman, a licensed motorcycle operator, sued the state to block enforcement of the law. Alder-man asserted that the statute violated the equal protection clause because it placed requirements on motorcyclists that were not imposed on other motorists. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions. 1. Why does this statute raise equal protection issues instead of substantive due process concerns?
2. What are the three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause?
3. Which standard of scrutiny, or test, would apply to this situation? why?
4. Applying this standard, is the helmet statute constitutional? why or why not?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:50, alyssa6383
Which life stage is often defined by a feeling of having a set course in life and an established career?
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00, lydia1melton
Two police officers stopped a car for a minor traffic violation. while one of the officers dealt with the driver and the traffic violation, the other officer talked with the passenger. seeking to question the passenger about gang involvement, but lacking reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, the officer ordered the passenger out of the car. as the passenger exited the car, the officer saw a bulge in the passenger's coat which the officer suspected might be a gun. upon patting down the passenger, the officer felt the handle of a revolver and removed the gun. the passenger, who was a convicted felon, was charged with the possession of a gun by a prohibited possessor. prior to trial, the defendant sought to suppress the gun as evidence, contending that its seizure was unconstitutional. should the court suppress the gun as evidence? ayes, because, since the car had been stopped for a traffic violation, the officer could not order the passenger, who had not committed the violation, to exit the car. byes, because, since the officer lacked reasonable suspicion that the passenger was engaged in criminal activity, the officer could not pat down the passenger. cno, because a valid traffic stop gives an officer the right to pat down a passenger. dno, because the gun was discovered as a consequence of a valid terry stop and frisk.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00, mayslays
Micah is studying child behavior in playgrounds throughout the world. he wants to see how the children react when teachers select the same child to be the first to use each piece of equipment. which approach is micah is using?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40, shaloveywrighty5965
Mrs. walter’s husband died in 2016. she has not remarried and has maintained a home for herself and her dependent son, whom she can claim as a dependent. in the summer of 2018, the son was killed in an automobile accident. what is mrs. walter’s filing status for 2018
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A state legislature enacted a statute that required any motorcycle operator or passenger on the stat...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 16.09.2019 20:20