Listed in the Item Bank are some key terms and expressions associated with the categories seen in the Venn Diagram. To find out more information about items, some have more details available when you click on them. Drag and drop each item onto the proper area of the
diagram. If an item describes more than one category, be sure to place it in the overlapping space.
ITEM BANK: Move to Bottom
Disequilibrium
Excess demand
Excess supply
Minimum Wage
Price Floor
Price ceiling
Rent control
Shortage
Both
Surplus

5elections for representatives to the u. s. house of representatives are held every two years. elections take place in november, and there is usually one republican candidate and one democratic candidate on the ballot. how are candidates chosen to appear on the ballot?

Thoreau’s actions in civil disobedience and the 1955 bus boycott are similar because both thoreau and the boycotters were

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.