subject
Social Studies, 05.02.2021 20:20 Kuwillalean38

Type of government in which the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution; usually head of state; has no real power. Absolute Monarchy
Dictatorship
Democracy
Constitutional Monarchy

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00, kaykardash
How does district of columbia v heller relate to federalism
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30, marcoantonioperezpan
What is a capital crime? its not social studies but they don't have criminal justice
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, elwinelwin9475
Occurs with the fully informed request of a competant adult patient or their surrogate. culture of life: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. voluntary euthanasia b. nonvoluntary euthanasia c. involuntary euthanasia d. passive euthanasia
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Type of government in which the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution; usually head of stat...

Questions in other subjects: