NEED HELP, INFO HERE> Cornell Notes: "Was Bienville a failure or a success, as a leader?" Elishia McAllister
•
Feb 4
100 points
Due 11:50 AM
https://www. wwno. org/post/founding-new-orleans-vagab ond-city
Use this wonderful podcast Mr. Kronenberg originally shared with you last month as a *launch point*! ^^
(I suggest you read along as the episode's audio plays, a minimum of 2 times.)
You should also use *at minimum 2 other sources*

Complete a *minimum* of 3 pages/ 9 sub-questions for a set of Cornell Notes
(exact same guidelines as used before, in class, for student success in class) on:
Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne de Bienville and his 'founding' of New Orleans (formerly known as Bulbancha)

I AM ESPECIALLY LOOKING TO SEE DETAILS OF THE CHICKASAW INDIAN WAR, HIS CAPTURE OF PENSACOLA FROM THE SPANISH and HIS INSTITUTION OF A STRICT "BLACK CODE" regulating the conduct of enslaved peoples.

Your essential question is >> "Was Bienville a failure or a success, as a leader?"

Your summary will argue, for or against, his leadership qualities in 7-10 concise (and well-supported) sentences.
Be sure to cite your evidence!

Type the correct answer in the box. spell the word correctly. in 1906, the muslim league was created to support the rights of muslims living in india under british rule. the leader of the muslim league in india was

What types of climate magnolia have

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.