subject
Social Studies, 02.02.2021 01:00 zayyyyy70

Use your knowledge of the definitions of validity, soundness, strength, and cogency to determine which of the following statements are true. Check all that apply. A statement is either valid or invalid. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 16:50, cheryljoseph69
for the past few months, seth has visited his elderly grandmother every weekend and her with chores and errands. he has come to think of himself as a person who is kind and to elders. as a source of self-knowledge, this is an example of
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30, ZachLaVine2016
Why did the settlement of east texas stop in the late 1710s
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30, shawk1468
Why was the leo frank case important ?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:20, unknown6669
Read the scenario. samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. she is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. after careful consideration, samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks. the fact that samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates-a cause.-minor consequences.-a trade off.-unexpected risk.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Use your knowledge of the definitions of validity, soundness, strength, and cogency to determine whi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 24.04.2021 21:50
Konu
Mathematics, 24.04.2021 21:50