Andrew Jackson was a self educated military leader, who when made a decision he stuck with it...Do you think as a president this is a good or bad thing? He did things like the following ... (He was in over 100 duels in his life) He imposed the Indian removal Act… (The Indian Removal Act was a law in the United States that was passed in 1830. ... It gave the President the power to force Native American tribes to move to land west of the Mississippi River. Not all American citizens liked the law.) Please explain your answer…… This is your personal opinion about if this makes a good president ...if you agree with it and why ...or if you do not agree and why..

no because you could slip up and say something and it could be very bad

Explanation:

it could be very bad

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals