subject
Social Studies, 27.01.2021 19:40 loki285

Put these events from the lead up to Americas injury into World War II and chronological order The Japanese Air Force attacks US army base at Pearl Harbor

The United States declares war on Japan

United States United States agrees to trade all destroyers for military bases in British territory

(look at my pic to understand)


Put these events from the lead up to Americas injury into World War II and chronological order

Th

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00, lizzbugg9880
Though most presidents have claimed affiliation with a christian church, the only roman catholic president has been a) abraham lincoln. b) john f. kennedy. c) george washington. d) franklin d. roosevelt.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00, zelds63481
Can i have all the nicknames of all 50 states of usa?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:10, grandpianograce
Identify metropolitan statistical area
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Put these events from the lead up to Americas injury into World War II and chronological order The...

Questions in other subjects: