Hauerwas encourages a prescriptive narrative ethical theory (and practice). What seems positive or helpful about this approach to ethics

The overview of the discussion has been summarized in the following section.

Explanation:

The narrative approach makes it easier to illustrate history objectively. We are contemporary creatures, but instead, everything we are doing varies depending on our history. At least participants could be greatly affected by something that has transpired. We start debating predefined happenings because once we would like to bring up the past. Hauerwas contends that the version of history is extremely important throughout Christian doctrine: "The storytelling configuration would be neither indirectly related nor unintentional with Christian theology. There is almost no foundational chance to communicate concerning God than someone throughout a narrator." The narrative process contributes to just about every other configuration of discussion if designers talk about Religion. Every moment someone could base individuals' views on something like a detailed outline. When you are used to previous experiences, this could give rise to a conflict.

Because although narrative framework has been somewhat valued, those certain methodologies also choose their relevance and therefore shouldn't be disheartened.

17.73 . . . .. .