subject
Social Studies, 16.01.2021 21:10 pamelaacuna

(A) Explain why states were not obligated to follow the provisions of the Second Amendment until 2010, even though they had to follow the provisions of the First Amendment.
(B) In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court decided that Washington, DC, could not prohibit the general
public from owning handguns. Explain why the court's decision did not require states to abide by the provision
(C) Describe under what circumstances a state or locality may prohibit firearm ownership.
ss Read Less

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:30, heroxtree
Why are committees necessary in congress?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:10, kevinh2683
In griswold v. connecticut, on what did justice goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the constitution the intention of the writers of the constitution the list of rights in the first eight amendments the human rights safe from government intervention
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30, Armendariz1
What conflict ended the false doctrine of "states rights"
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:40, vale4287
The long english tradition of figured prominently in the founding fathers' discussion of the ownership of firearms. a) police squads b) target practice c) aristocratic rifle associations d) militias
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
(A) Explain why states were not obligated to follow the provisions of the Second Amendment until 201...

Questions in other subjects: