subject
Social Studies, 13.01.2021 14:00 kingcory717

In 1832 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the state of Georgia had no right to force the Cherokee from their native lands. Why did this ruling have little positive effect?

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10, Treezy11
In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00, zuleromanos
How can the judiciary balance individual rights with the common good?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00, nghtcll
What is the phrase describes the paleo-indians of prehistoric arkansas
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, ilonkaip6323
Can someone me answer all the questions?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1832 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the state of Georgia had...

Questions in other subjects: