How did the Industrial Revolution contribute overall to WWI?

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

answer; all over the above; //everybody

answer; you are making a normative argument and i am making a positive argument;

the correct answer is the letter a

bright white has the greatest comparative advantage as it produces more than double the amount of small tubes than large in an hour.

sparkling comes next as it produces exactly double the amount which is to be expected

fresh comes in third because it only produces 50 more small tubes than large.

the company that shows the least comparative advantage is mmmint as it produces the same amount of small and large tubes.