A woman in California possesses a medical marijuana card and grows 6 plants in her home. One day, the Drug Enforcement Agency executes a search warrant and all of her marijuana plants are confiscated. The woman sues, arguing that she was in legal possession of the plants and therefore she should have them back. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court, how should the court rule?

If the permit she got was from the necessary agency to carry it out, then supreme Court have to rule in her favour

Explanation:

What would help someone in this situation to gain a win at the supreme Court is if the validation she got was from the right agency. Secondly, if the laws have not been reviewed or changed. If the permit she got was from the necessary agency to carry it out, then supreme Court have to rule in her favour. The supreme Court works with the law, so it'll be read or used while judging the case

it is loom ps i took the test

answer; the above statement is (false);