subject
Social Studies, 16.12.2020 01:00 kerra61

MARKING BRAINIST PLZ HELP Why was the result of the election of 1876 controversial?

A. An election commission, not the popular or electoral vote, decided the election

B. Hayes won the majority of electoral votes, but Tilden won the popular vote.

C. The Supreme Court decided the election after one state's results were unclear.

D. Tilden won the popular and electoral votes, but Congress decided to elect Hayes.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00, onepunchman20
In the construction of a new housing development which factor of production can be categorized as land?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00, powellmj9216
1. how did conditions in germany and europe at the end of world war i contribute to the rise and triumph of nazism in germany? 2. how did the german government under nazi rule build support among the german people? 3. how did nazi germany gradually isolate, segregate, impoverish, and incarcerate jews and persecute other perceived enemies of the state between 1933 and 1939? 4. how did the nazis lead germany to war in europe and, with their collaborators, kill millions—including systematically murdering six million jewish people? 5. why is learning about the holocaust important? so we don’t repeat history.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30, TordtheMan982
Suppose you are a freshmen in college and you have not declared a major. one reason you enrolled at your respective college was the school's vibrant social life. at the same time, you want to balance your academic life because you know that your grades will matter for graduate school or job applications. you decide to forgo partying for two hours to study for an upcoming economics exam. in your first semester's principles of economics class, you learn that the enjoyment you would have received from partying is an example of a(n)
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
MARKING BRAINIST PLZ HELP Why was the result of the election of 1876 controversial?

A. A...

Questions in other subjects: