Social Studies, 13.12.2020 22:50 jkortis15

Answer these two: 6. Based on the article, do you think the people who lived in the slums respected the bosses and
their political machines? Why or why not? Explain.

7. After looking at the video and reading the article, why do you think political machines were able
to rise to power?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, kelyanthecrafte

For 50 pointsfredrika's science teacher asked her to bring in three abiotic items from her backyard ecosystem. which of the following groups of items should she bring? a. a lightning bug, a plug of grass, and a wormb. a smooth rock, some red dirt, and an empty bird's nestc. a ladybug, a spider, and some water from a mud puddled. a caterpillar, a pine cone, and a piece of a robin's egg

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:00, mmaglaya1

The authuor says that in some town hall meeting several thousand citizens might attend and vote . what would you do to make sure a town hall meeting of that many people would run smmothly

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:20, frostylui

Which of the following is a major difference between appellate courts and courts of first instance? a. appellate courts do not use a jury, only judges. courts of first instance hold appellate jurisdiction exclusively. c. courts of first instance do not use judges and appellate courts do. d. appellate courts hear all criminal and civil cases and courts of first instance do not.

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Answer these two: 6. Based on the article, do you think the people who lived in the slums respected...