![subject](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
Social Studies, 09.12.2020 04:00 gonzalezjacquel7975
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the U. S. Supreme Court upheld the right of the federal government to incorporate the Second National Bank, even though this ability was not explicitly stated in the U. S. Constitution.
Which clause from the U. S. Constitution did the U. S. Supreme Court use to support this ruling?
A) The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare .
B) The Congress shall have the power . . . To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers.
C) The Congress shall have the power . . . To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting .
D) The Congress shall have Power . . . To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.
![ansver](/tpl/images/cats/User.png)
Answers: 2
![](/tpl/images/ask_question.png)
![](/tpl/images/ask_question_mob.png)
Other questions on the subject: Social Studies
![image](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, raymondanthony3314
Explain what commentary austen is making about social conversation based on this excerpt. your answer should be at least 150 words.
Answers: 2
![image](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:00, wrolle
An insurer issued a homeowner’s policy that covered collectible historical documents. the documents, valued at and insured for $70,000, were lost in a fire that destroyed the home. prior to paying the homeowner, the insurer received a demand from a third party that the insurer pay the $70,000 to the third party. the third party contended that the documents had been stolen from the third party. the insurer and third party were citizens of the same state, while the homeowner was a citizen of a different state. the insurer would like to file a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court for the state of which the homeowner is a citizen. although this state has a long-arm statute, neither that statute nor the general service of process rules would permit service of process on the third party. the insurer does not wish to deposit the $70,000 with the court or post a bond pending resolution of this matter. of the following, which is a valid reason for advising against the filing of a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court? adiversity of citizenship does not exist between the insurer and the third party.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the U. S. Supreme Court upheld the right of the federal government...
Questions in other subjects:
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 28.05.2021 20:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/fizika.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 28.05.2021 20:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 28.05.2021 20:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 28.05.2021 20:30
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)