Whats 1 claim about ancient rome?

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Provide an example of how you have successfully taken into account individual differences in dealing with people. in what way did your approach make a difference in the outcome of the interaction with that person?

Growth of the business (be sure to use the terms “culture” and “cultural diffusion” in this section.) of debbie fields. plz me