subject
Social Studies, 30.11.2020 01:10 moneymaleia9264

Which answer best expresses what the Articles of Confederation said about taxing Americans? (1 point) a Only Congress could raise taxes, so states had a hard time paying their debts and expenses. b Only the states could raise taxes, so the national government had a hard time paying its debts and expenses. c Both the states and Congress could raise taxes, so Americans often gave so much money to the government that they had a hard time paying their own debts. d Neither the states nor Congress could raise taxes, so they depended on donations from wealthy Americans to help pay their debts and expenses.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:10, adios0
Thoreau’s actions in civil disobedience and the 1955 bus boycott are similar because both thoreau and the boycotters were
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:10, chammusa2
Which action would the president's political party most likely take to resolve this issue
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30, ineedhelp368
Gif the public and community loses trust in banks it affects the entire u. s. financial system. in order to keep this type of financial contagion from happening, the fed makes as needed short-term emergency loans, by acting as the lender of last resort. guides and regulates private deposit insurance programs to cover insolvent bank losses. decreases the money supply as acting lender of last resort.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which answer best expresses what the Articles of Confederation said about taxing Americans? (1 point...

Questions in other subjects: