According to the Anti-Federalist Papers, are the Bill of Rights necessary? Why or why not? Cite evidence from at least one of the Anti-Federalist Papers to support your claim.

Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists felt that a Bill of Rights was necessary.

Here is an excerpt from the 46th Anti-Federalist paper:

"The Congress are therefore vested with the supreme legislative power, without control. In giving such immense, such unlimited powers, was there no necessity of a Bill of Rights, to secure to the people their liberties?"

In this quote, the Anti-Federalists state that the legislative branch is given great , but not restricted power. The Anti-Federalists worried the government would be powerful and out of control. They believed a Bill of Rights would protect the people and their freedoms, in case the government tried to rob the people of their rights.

France played a key role in the american revolutionary war (american war of independence; 1775–1783). motivated by the ideals of the new nation which were inspired by the french enlightenment, as well as its long-term rivalry with britain and so as to avenge their territorial losses during the french and indian war, france secretly began sending supplies to the americans in 1775.

Clean air provides nitrogen