subject
Social Studies, 19.11.2020 23:10 jazwhi1507

HELP ME THIS DUE TODAY AND I DON'T UNDERSTAN PL I BEGGING YOU ALSO WRITE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDSSS (75 points)

1. What rights/power did Anne Hutchinson have/not have? What was she trying to fight for?

2. Explain how coverture played a role in the lives of these women.

3. How was the power of women limited in the colonial period?

4. Explain one way women tried to exercise power.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30, caitlynnpatton1208
Sociology is best described as the systematic study of
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30, mandy9386
Me and i you plus a 5 stars and brainlist
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, lalisa6745
Arecession is the total value of all goods produced in a country in a given year total value of all goods and services produced in a country in a given year total amount of money earned in a nation over a specific period of time none of the answers are correct.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
HELP ME THIS DUE TODAY AND I DON'T UNDERSTAN PL I BEGGING YOU ALSO WRITE IT IN YOUR OWN WORDSSS (75...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Computers and Technology, 17.10.2019 16:40
Konu
English, 17.10.2019 16:40
Konu
Mathematics, 17.10.2019 16:40