Which two sentences about inferences based on numeric variables are true? A strong positive or negative correlation can be used to prove a causal relationship, while the absence of correlation can be used to rule out a causal relationship. The absence of correlation can be used to rule out a causal relationship, but the presence of a strong positive or negative correlation does not prove a causal relationship. Strong correlations between two variables are sometimes explained by the influence of a third lurking variable that has a causal relationship with both variables. If a variable is known to be affected by multiple causes, its strong positive or negative correlations with other variables are likely to be spurious.

The absence of correlation can be used to rule out a causal relationship, but the presence of a strong positive or negative correlation does not prove a causal relationship.

Explanation:

When there is a correlation between two events, it means that they occur in a certain way in regards to each other. This does not always mean that one causes the other however as it could simply be coincidence.

On the other hand, if there is no correlation whatsoever, then there is no causal relationship because if one of the events causes the other, it would have to be correlated with it.

i'll just take the points xd

the language of nature was a manifestation from god as he said "let there be light" and there was light the world began to assume visible, comprehensible form.

what ever we know now think of the old vision of creation we can be sure that with out the speaking of word -without language- we would have no science today with its striking power to illuminate the world.