Compare and Contrast: a. The Divine Command Theory in ethics.
b. Aristotle's virtue ethic. Where do they agree?

The definition is defined throughout the clarification section below, as per the circumstance given.

Explanation:

Divine Command Theory:

This idea was whether morality would somehow be contingent on God and that adherence to something like the commands of God constitutes legal responsibility. That suggests that the philosophy asserts that as a result of their being ordered by God, positive acts are morally good, what God wants is morally correct.

Aristotle's virtue ethic:

However, according to Aristotle, individuals would likely make the correct decision when confronted against ethical obstacles by honoring virtuous behaviors. Or a person builds a noble as well as a moral character through the practice of someone being trustworthy, courageous, just, compassionate, and so forth.

When we equate the two, the Devine Command theory suggests that faith is the one that enjoins everyone to act well and offers ethical models regardless of their shortcomings.Seeing as the philosophy of Virtue Ethics states, we are surely beings of negative and positive behaviors that encompass our conscious awareness and actions. Therefore, the point of consensus between both hypotheses is that persons exhibit moral but also non-moral traits, and those who show and do moral conduct are decent, even though they are homeless people elsewhere.But perhaps the main point of contention is that rather than his instruction, God decides who would be moral or evil people by contradicting the philosophy of virtue ethics by saying that perhaps the positive or poor behaviors are the responsibility of people, nothing at all like heaven.

This link explains it