subject
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 18:30 alopez324789

Why did the Puritans start a colony separate from the Pilgrims? A. They opposed the missionary efforts practiced by Pilgrims. B. They found some land better suited to farming than Plymouth. C. They wanted their colony to show how to reform the Church of England. D. They wanted to live closer to the Native Americans.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30, brainy51
Explain the nazi cult of motherhood? (5 marks)
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30, ThousandSeas9381
How did economics delay scientists' first attempts for conservation in each story? describe the political actions that led to successful conservation in both stories. i have them all done but these two. none of my teachers are responding and i just need . i can show both stories.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:00, alissiabenner4087
Why were the articles of confederation replaced with the constitution? a. the articles of confederation did not vice strong power to the federal government. b. the articles of confederation did not create a government structure for the states. c. the articles of confederation did not provide powers for strong individual state governments. d. the articles of confederation did not allow the federal government to deal with foreign countries.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why did the Puritans start a colony separate from the Pilgrims? A. They opposed the missionary effor...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 22:40