GDP and GDP per capita. Mark all of the following that are true.

Group of answer choices

GDP shows how people live in a country

Real GDP is found by: Nominal GDP / price index * 100

GDP per capita is found by: Real GDP / population

GDP per capita show the overall power a country has in international relations

GDP is found by taking Nominal GDP / Population

GDP per capita shows the size of an economy

GDP is best used to show the power a country has in international issues

GDP per capita is best used to show how people live in a country

GDP per capita the amount of output per person in a country

GDP show the overall size of an economy

GDP per capita shows in general how the average person lives in a country

GDP per capita shows the total production in a country

GDP per capita is found by: Real GDP / population

GDP shows the overall size of an economy

GDP per capita is best used to show how people live in a country

GDP per capita shows in general how the average person lives in a country

Explanation:

Gross domestic product is a measure that includes all of the final products and services sold in a country in a specific time period, this time frame is often 1 year. So basically all of the money that the economy of a given country produced in a year.

This measure speaks about the overall size of the economy, real GDP is calculated by the formula Nominal GDP/deflator.

GDP per capita is calculated by diving the real gdp/total population, and it is used to calculate the average amount of money that a country produces per person, and it is often also thought of the general way in which a the average person lives in a country.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )