(FOR 100 POINTS) Summarize the argument being made in this document. What is the most compelling evidence used by the author to support it? ^^this is the link to the document^^

-please answer the following questions. each number should be a separate paragraph.

1. The response should explain the argument the State Department makes in the document.
2. The response should explain the evidence the document includes to support its argument.
3. The response should include supporting evidence in the form of examples, details, statistics, or facts.

-determine what the argument is and have evidence to support it. all is found in the article.

In the compound republic of america, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and then the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. the different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.—madison, number 51 based on the quote, which of the following statements would madison have likely supported? development of political parties is necessary to ensure the security and stability of a democratic government. a government must have enough power to govern however, its power must also be limited by creating multiple branches within it. one government can not carry out the will of the people alone, therefore the establishment of two separate governments is necessary. a government must sometimes limit civil liberties of individuals to ensure the safety and security of all citizens.

Which of these was not a key difference between northern and southern states at the constitutional convention? wanting to protect states’ interests vs. a government with strict rules having more, larger cities vs. having fewer, smaller cities wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries having many enslaved people vs. using less enslaved labor

Aresearcher conducts a focus group to learn about attitudes towards hygiene and disease prevention. two weeks after the focus group, the researcher learns one of the subjects had a heart attack at home and was hospitalized, but made a full recovery. based on dhs regulations, the researcher report this event to the irb? no, this does not need to be reported since the subject had the heart attack when they were home, not at the focus group. no, this does not need to be reported since it is unrelated to participation in the study. no, this does not need to be reported because two weeks have passed. no, this does not need to be reported since the subject recovered.