subject
Social Studies, 26.10.2020 16:40 NobleWho

LeVay’s discovery of the INAH-3 nucleus in the brain that is larger in heterosexual men than in homosexual men definitively proves that sexual orientation is a. A result of hormones. b. Biologically determined. c. A result of socialization. d. None of the above.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:10, jasminelockhart432
Which of the following is true of cultural syndromes of distress? a. it refers to attributing pathological symptoms to normative cultural differences. b. refers to misinterpreting culturally sanctioned behavior as expressions of pathological symptoms. c. it refers to the ways that communities and cultural groups communicate and express their distressing thoughts, behaviors, and emotions. d. it refers to patterns of symptoms that tend to cluster together for individuals in specific cultural groups, communities, or contexts.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, bloodry
Samantha is looking for a boyfriend. based on the gender differences explained in this activity, which is she likely to prefer?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:10, deaishaajennings123
When individuals with a stake in an issue affecting them begin to propose and develop solutions to a problem, they engage in
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
LeVay’s discovery of the INAH-3 nucleus in the brain that is larger in heterosexual men than in homo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 25.03.2021 05:10
Konu
Mathematics, 25.03.2021 05:10