subject
Social Studies, 20.10.2020 01:01 benoitjaylewe

First Paragraph: Hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. You can tell a story or use a quote. Introduce the event and basic facts like people and places. Use at least three to five sentences. Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.

Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.

Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.

PLS MAKE IT LOOK LIGIT DONT MAKE IT SEE LIKE I WROTE IT AND IMA BAD INFORMER

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30, liloleliahx2
U. s. history 1.documentary analysis what steps did taylor’s family take to prepare her freedom
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:30, qvezne7683
Which researcher found american capitalism and the inequality of women to be at odds with the country's professed moral principles?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, Zaviahector1124
Which of the following is an executive check on the powers of the judicial branch of government? a. presides over senate during hearing to impeach the president b. enforces term limits for supreme court justices c. nominates supreme court justices and federal judges d. casts tie-breaking vote if the supreme court cannot reach a verdict
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
First Paragraph: Hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. You can tell a story o...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 15.01.2021 17:00
Konu
Mathematics, 15.01.2021 17:00