In a study, participants were asked to watch a video of two teams- one in white outfits and one in black outfits passing a ball to each other. Participants were asked to count the number of times the white team successfully passed the ball. During the video, a woman in a black gorilla suit walked through the middle of the two teams and stopped to thump her chest. After the video, only about half the participants reported that they had noticed the woman in the gorilla suit What phenomenon was this study examining? a. habituation
b. just noticeable difference
c. bottom-up processing
d. inattentional blindness

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.