subject
Social Studies, 17.10.2020 22:01 molliemoo1002

ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are understandably furious and fearful over the likelihood that President Trump and the Republican-controlled Senate will replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative. That does not justify packing the Supreme Court with progressives in retaliation…
...The United States has faced this dilemma before. The incredibly bitter election of 1800 featured Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson and incumbent President John Adams, a Federalist, who traded accusations that the other was undemocratic and would destroy the new nation. Federalists responded by expanding the number of judges with what derisively became known as the Midnight Judges Act. Adams also appointed a new United States chief justice, John Marshall, who was confirmed by the Federalist-controlled Senate only seven days after his nomination. Jefferson’s party later repealed the act packing the lower courts and terminated the judgeships, but did not seek to pack the Supreme Court to override the Federalist majority, even after Marshall authored the landmark Marbury v. Madison opinion establishing the judiciary’s power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The result was the establishment of the norm we have come to treasure: judicial independence even in the face of fierce partisanship.
That independence must be preserved — especially because the judiciary has assumed so much power since our nation’s founding. The court’s composition is politically controversial precisely because it has used the power Marshall established to decide politically contentious questions. Once courts become political footballs, new governments will expand courts to ensure that court rulings never go against their will. That would eviscerate the Bill of Rights, turning it from a protection against majority rule into a mere parchment proclamation….”
1) Within the context of the situation described in the excerpt above, explain how Judicial review is at work.
2) Explain how the scenario described in the excerpt above could affect the policy-making process.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:00, zmzmzmzmz2975
5elections for representatives to the u. s. house of representatives are held every two years. elections take place in november, and there is usually one republican candidate and one democratic candidate on the ballot. how are candidates chosen to appear on the ballot?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00, syulerio8418
What is the term used for the belief that the white race is superior to all other races
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:10, paigedice8090
Melissa’s mother, rita baker, shows up shortly after the hospital receives melissa’s letter requesting release of her information to her attorney again. rita states that the attorney needs the copies as soon as possible due to a court deadline, refers to it as “an emergency” and asks to be given the copies of melissa’s medical record to take to the attorney’s office. what action should the record clerk take and why?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:20, Blazingangelkl
Question 2 of 102 pointshow did the protestant reformation impact the european enlightenment? oa. it convinced many europeans that only biblical laws should befollowed. ob. it required christians to sign a social contract with the protestantchurchoc. it created a new christian country with a republican form ofgovernmentd. it led many people to question the idea that a king's power camefrom god.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are unders...

Questions in other subjects: