Social Studies, 14.10.2020 14:01 chris7055
Coach Chuck unjustifiably throws a water bottle at Smith intending to strike Smith. However, Chuck misses Smith. Specifically, the bottle whizzes by Smith's head and misses him by about an inch. The bottle then strikes the hat Potter is wearing on his head. The bottle does not make contact with Potter's body. Of course Chuck never wanted to make contact with Potter. Potter, turns his head trying to avoid the bottle and he reasonably finds the whole incident to be highly offensive. Potter sues Chuck for Assault and Battery. Which of the following is most true?
A. Chuck is not laible for assault or battery because Potter did not suffer any physical harm.
B. Chuck is not liable because he did not intend to make contact with Potter.
C. Chuck is not liable for battery because the bottle did not make contact with Potter's body but he is liable for assault.
D. Chuck is liable to Potter for both Battery and Assault
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:40, Mdaulton1182
Hurrry plzzz 16 points which major economic activity in the middle east occurs largely in the areas circled on the map above? a. coal mining b. farming c. nomadic herding d. oil production
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00, ishrael2001
In the case of furman v. georgia (1972), the united states supreme court ruled that the death penalty- in specific cases- being arbitrarily and inconsistently imposed, often in a discriminatory manner. as a result, the imposition of the death penalty as a punishment was stopped throughout the united states.
Answers: 1
Coach Chuck unjustifiably throws a water bottle at Smith intending to strike Smith. However, Chuck m...
Business, 30.10.2020 18:20
English, 30.10.2020 18:20
English, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20