Which of the following best explains the evolution of English colonial governments during the colonial period? a. Most of the colonial governments began as the Royal government and transitioned to proprietary regimes under joint stock companies.

b. Most of the colonial governments began as proprietary or chartered colonies that were governed based on the charters and proprietors but transitioned into colonies with Royal Governors and bicameral assemblies that made laws.
c. The English colonial governments were very different from each other, with some having colonial Kings that were in charge of individual colonies.
d. The English colonial governments did not change during the colonial period. They began as absolute democracies and remained absolute democracies until the U. S. Constitution was ratified in 1787.

Look at the historical context sheet. how might settlers’ attitudes towards native americans have changed from the 1630s to the 1650s? how might settlers’ attitudes toward the land have changed from the 1630s to the 1650s? explain you answer. (4 points)

There are 25 elements found in living things. how many of these elements are found in some organisms but not all? 1 , 6 , 19 , 25

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?