Which of the following pieces of evidence would best support an argument in favor of a teen curfew?
~ an interview with a parent who thinks teen curfews are a good idea
~ an online poll of cumunity members who would like to see a teen curfew established
~ a newspaper article describing reduced crime rates in cities with teen curfews
~ a fyler posted in the school cafeteria encouraging srudents to support teen curfew

The answer is: a newspaper article describing reduced crime rates in cities with teen curfews.

This piece of evidence would best support an argument in favor of a teen curfew because it is based in facts, not opinions, and it shows that other places that have established teen curfews have had positive results because of it. Therefore, there is evidence to asume the possibility that if teen curfew is established in other cities, it would get the same positive results.

An onlilne poll of comunity members and an interview with a parent would serve as evidence when studying how the community feels about teen curfew but not as evidence in an argument in favor of teen curfew because the data would be biased.

the united states has a federal government. the president is the head of the federal government of the united states. however, each state forms its government for administration purposes. the powers of the state governments are exercised within restricted state boundaries. and citizens participate in this government by voting.