How do religion, law, and philosophy each provide different grounds for justifying a moral principle? How can each perspective be applied in analyzing the moral principle "Stealing is wrong"? Be sure to elaborate and provide your "theoretical" rationale in support of your position. (knowledge)

Answer and Explanation:

Each perspective in the form of religion, law and philosophy justifies moral principles on the grounds of what is acceptable and what is not based on certain established codes. Religion justifies moral principle on the basis of right or wrong which is dictated by a supernatural force. Law and philosophy are closely related on how they justify moral principles. While law pays more attention to what is generally accepted by the people, philosophy bases moral principles on reason and logic

both are monotheistic however, christians believe jesus is the savior and jews believe jesus is just another prophet.

explanation: