Social Studies, 07.09.2020 14:01 jaylanmahone223

How can the provinces having more agricultural land contribute for the development in Nepal ?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, KittyLitty

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, ozzy1146

3. define historiography. has historiography changed over time or stayed the same? why is this distinction important? use complete sentences for your response. (4 points)

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, priscilaannmendez

Plz 20 ! in a citizens elect the president as head of government separately from the legislature? a: parliamentary democracy b: communist state c: presidential democracy d: autocratic state

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, Amyra2003

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.