While some food preferences remain deeply embedded in culture, there is plenty of evidence that global dietary preferences are converging. Examples of such a change can be predicted from the

Options :

a. the popularity of Domino's Pizza in Italy

b. the preference for local hamburgers from a local chain, Jollibee's, in Philippines

c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally

d. the increased sales of soups and noodles in Thailand

e. popularity of Chinese foods in Taiwan

c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally

Explanation: Cultural dictation in the preference of food refers to an individual's inclination to the type of food usually adopted or consumed in one's region. This is usually natural since these type of diets are what is being consumed from a very tender age. However, as development and growth occurs, people get know about other food types, dietary and nutritional benefits of various food types, thus allowing individuals to make choices based on nutritional Dividends one may derive from the consumption of certain diets. People are starting to opt for diets or food containing more nutritional and healthier supplements supplements. One of the evidences could be derived when there is a surge in the number of foreign kitchens in regions where it doesn't exist before. The surge could be termed to mean that demand for these diets are starting to converge. Such as the global increase in the number of McDonald's restaurants.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

no

explanation: